Which factor is NOT considered by the court when assessing the use of deadly force?

In assessing the use of deadly force, courts focus on several critical factors that relate to the immediacy and severity of the threat faced by the individual. The necessity for self-defense, the presence of immediate jeopardy, and the opportunity for conflict resolution are all significant benchmarks that courts examine to determine whether the use of deadly force was justified under the circumstances.

Deadly force authorization training, while it plays an essential role in ensuring that individuals understand the protocols and legal frameworks surrounding the use of force, is not a direct factor in the court's assessment of an individual case. Courts are more concerned with the context of the situation and the actions of the individual at the moment the force was used, rather than the individual's training background. This distinction highlights why the court does not consider training as a relevant factor when evaluating whether the use of deadly force was appropriate.